May Market Risk Update

Dear Clients & Friends,

This weekend, we return to our monthly risk update from the Independent Advisor. If you’ve read this column for some time now, you’ve probably picked up on a slow but steady change in tone.  While we do not see immediate substantial risk, there is no doubt that risk is rising. While I don’t want to give away our secret topics for future articles, I will admit that we are preparing a very noteworthy article regarding our forecast for the rest of this year, and our concerns for 2018 and 2019.  For now, let us focus on the risks and metrics at hand. Here’s where we are…


Risk factor #1: Valuation levels

When it comes to assessing valuations, I find longer-term metrics—particularly the cyclically adjusted Shiller P/E ratio, which looks at average earnings over the past 10 years—to be the most useful in determining overall risk.

 

Capture May 1
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This chart is interesting for a few reasons. First, we can see that, since the presidential election in November, equity valuations have increased to levels consistent with the early 2000s. Second, gains in March kept valuations high—well above pre-election levels.

Although they are close to their highest level in 15 years, valuations are still below their peak, so you might argue that this metric does not suggest immediate risk. Of course, that also assumes we might be heading back to 2000 bubble conditions, which isn’t exactly reassuring. 

Risk factor #2: Changes in valuation levels

As good as the Shiller P/E ratio is as a risk indicator, it’s a terrible timing indicator. One way to remedy that is to look at changes in valuation levels over time instead of absolute levels.

 

Capture May 2
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here, you can see that when valuations roll over, with the change dropping below zero over a 10-month or 200-day period, the market itself typically drops shortly thereafter. The post-election rally has kept changes in valuations at a good level, so this indicator shows low immediate risk.

Risk factor #3: Margin debt

Another indicator of potential trouble is margin debt.

Capture May 3
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt levels as a percentage of market capitalization have moved back to all-time highs in recent months, which raises the risk level considerably. This high level of debt is concerning; however, as noted above, high risk is not necessarily immediate risk.

Risk factor #4: Changes in margin debt

Changes in margin debt are a better indicator of immediate risk than the overall level of debt. Consistent with this, if we look at the change over time, spikes in debt levels typically precede a drawdown.

 

Capture May 4
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see in the chart above, the change in debt as a percentage of market capitalization remains low—although it is getting higher and closer to the risk zone. Further, although the absolute level of margin debt is high—and therefore so is the risk level—we do not yet see the kind of spike that signals trouble. Immediate risk, therefore, is moderate but increasing.

Risk factor #5: The Buffett indicator

Said to be favored by Warren Buffett, the final indicator is the ratio of the value of all the companies in the market to the national economy as a whole.

 

Capture May 5
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On an absolute basis, the Buffett indicator is actually somewhat encouraging. Although it remains high, it has pulled back to less extreme levels. The index has increased since the election, though, so we’ll need to monitor the situation going forward.

Technical metrics are also reasonably encouraging, with all three major U.S. indices well above their 200-day trend lines. Even as markets approach new highs, it’s quite possible that the advance will continue given growth in earnings and positive consumer, business, and investor sentiment. A break into new territory could actually propel the market higher, despite the high valuation risk level.

Immediate risk level is low but increasing

Many of the indicators point to an elevated level of risk, but these high levels, while concerning, don’t signal an immediate problem. Instead, they may be driven largely by the positive sentiment surrounding the post-election rally. What does bear watching is the immediate risk level, which, while low, is starting to increase.

 


In the coming weeks, we plan to write more about our outlook for 2018 and 2019 which is unfortunately not very rosy.  Economics lives within a series of cycles, as do many things in this world.  We believe that the current cycle is coming to an end, and we believe that the end may be scary for those who are unprepared. With that in mind, we will do our very best to prepare our clients and set expectations. Risks are rising, but we do not see imminent risk, though we are gearing up to write about when we think that may happen.  So stayed tuned because that’s an article for another week.  Hint hint….

 

Matthew Ramer, AIF®
Principal, Financial Advisor
MOR Wealth Management, LLC


1801 Market Street, Suite 2435
Philadelphia, PA 19103
P: 267.930-8301 | c: 215-694-4784 | f: 267.284.4847 |


601 21st Street, Suite 300
Vero Beach, FL 32960
P: 772-453-2810

matthew.ramer@morwm.com | www.morwm.com

The majority of this content was written and distributed MOR Wealth Management, all rights reserved. Securities and advisory services offered through Commonwealth Financial Network, Member FINRA/SIPC, a registered investment adviser. Fixed insurance products and services offered through CES Insurance Agency. Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. As stated above, commentary for the 5 risk factors provided by Brad McMillan and published in the Independent Market Observer.  Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets. The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index. The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.